Visitor

Create

Name	-	To know who you are.
Avatar	-	To display with your posts and comments.
E-Mail	-	To send you updates and notifications. We will never send unsolicited mail.

Talkonomy thrives on your participation!

Please log in to share and discuss ideas!

Updates

Activity

Functional Programming

Functional Programming For The Rest of Us

by Manigandan Muthusamy

Edit Invite People

Alawys express your thoughts and ideas with relevant images and videos to communicate more effectively. There is a 1400 character limit on every post. The input box border turns 'Orange' when you are half way through and 'Red' after you reach the limit. Only line breaks are allowed in posts.

PS: You cannot create Posts until you reach Level 3 - More Info

Maven

Level 8

Praveen Baratam - 7 years ago Permalink Edit

Many of us programmers fumble at the idea of Functional Programming and yet many others who do not program for a living and experts in other fields often find it intuitive. Many physicists, bio-tech engineers and research labs embrace this seemingly bizarre programming culture.

Determined to understand this counter intuitive phenomenon, I started looking at the gap between the proponents and bystanders of FP.

Interestingly most programmers start by learning about processors, memory, machine language, data structures, etc. and then harness these machines by learning to instruct them. This learning locks their thought process into the imperative lane and they fumble on the idea of immutable data and lazy execution.

Whereas those coming from different domains looking for solutions to their problems find FP a natural fit for their needs as they only care about their problems and have no pre-installed conceptions about computing.

Save Cancel

Programmers Vs. Scientists

2 Comments

Manigandan Muthusamy, Evangelist - 7 years ago Edit

a=a+1 makes sense in our programming language an suddenly we forgot why in mathematics we never wrote like that and assumed its valid in maths also. People coming from pure science and math background see a=a+1 as something that does not fit into their fundamental building block and hence functional programming is popular with them.

Save Cancel

Praveen Baratam, Maven - 7 years ago Edit

IO is another pain point for FP. Its hard to imagine and do IO the FP way.

Save Cancel

There is a 500 character limit on every comment. The input box border turns 'Orange' when you are half way through and 'Red' after you reach the limit. Line breaks are not allowed in comments.

Post Comment Cancel

Evangelist

Level 4

Manigandan Muthusamy - 7 years ago Permalink Edit

http://www.defmacro.org/ramblings/fp.html

Talk on functional programming and what it is good and why its better than imperative programming are abudant on the internet but they all assume that the audience have certain basic knowledge on Lambada, Mondas, CPS, and are well versed with Turning vs Church model and they talk in a language that deals with these bigger concepts but for audience who have spend many many years on imperative programming these academic papers are ignored either as difficult or irrelevant to real software development. This article breaks the barrier and introduces fp to rest of the programming community

Save Cancel

7 Comments - Show All

Praveen Baratam, Maven - 7 years ago Edit

Fantastic read about Functional Programming. From where I see Immutable Objects is the largest hiccup in FP for regular developers. Suddenly the entire thought process that goes into writing code needs to be rewired.

Save Cancel

Manigandan Muthusamy, Evangelist - 7 years ago Edit

The concept of no side effect is a concept that is not very well understood by the programming community at large, we'r used to write code that change state hence our though process is ingrained with mutation and side effects . FP is about no side effect hence no need to mutate objects.

Save Cancel

Praveen Baratam, Maven - 7 years ago Edit

The problem with non-mutable data is that we have always thought of representing state in variables and objects. If we want functional programming to catch up we need simpler ways to track state and flow in a program.

Save Cancel

Manigandan Muthusamy, Evangelist - 7 years ago Edit

What we need is new school of thought, we need to teach new algorithm that can do simple activity, all these days programming is about storing data, transforming data, presenting data and we have algorithms that effectively mutate data to get to the desired form.

Save Cancel

Manigandan Muthusamy, Evangelist - 7 years ago Edit

Algorithms like merge sort is a classic example of doing it in functional manner

Save Cancel

Praveen Baratam, Maven - 7 years ago Edit

But merge sort is an advanced topic. We need simpler and intuitive examples and metaphors to propose FP as a better alternative.

Save Cancel

Manigandan Muthusamy, Evangelist - 7 years ago Edit

Merge sort is very fundamental to computing, its one algorithm that address quite a lot of computing activity, its the best example of comparison based sorting and the beauty is it can be done without having to mutate (can be implemented using functional programming concepts in imperative language)

Save Cancel

There is a 500 character limit on every comment. The input box border turns 'Orange' when you are half way through and 'Red' after you reach the limit. Line breaks are not allowed in comments.

Post Comment Cancel

Flip Side Of Technology

Are running shoes good enough? On one hand they protect...

Evolutionary Psychology

Altruism, the much revered behavior we all idealize but...

♦	Create and mantain yet another profile.
♦	Remember one more username/password.

Your idea goes here...	POST
Attach: Image Video